

Debian bug report logs - #791 , boring messages

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:


Subject: Bug#791: To the TeX mantainer.
Reply-To: ecl%gluon@meson.if.usp.br (Emilio C. Lopes), 
debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-From: ecl%gluon@meson.if.usp.br (Emilio C. Lopes)
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 1995 20:03:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.791.041119491120546@pixar.com>
X-Debian-PR-Package: 
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Tue, 11 Apr 1995 20:03:02 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 041119491120546;
          Tue, 11 Apr 1995 19:49:11 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
        (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rylus-0005q5C; Tue, 11 Apr 95 12:48 PDT
Received: from gluon (meson.if.usp.br) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA03981
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <debian-bugs@pixar.com>); Tue, 11 Apr 1995 
12:47:47 -0700
Message-Id: <199504111947.AA03981@pixar.com>
Received: by gluon
        (1.37.109.4/16.2) id AA07703; Tue, 11 Apr 95 16:47:46 -0300
From: ecl%gluon@meson.if.usp.br (Emilio C. Lopes)
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 95 16:47:45 SAT
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]

Some problems I've found with TeX under Debian 0.93R5. Some are bugs,
others aren't.

 - The versions of LaTeX, AMSLaTeX, Babel et cetera are *OLD*. Newer
   versions of LaTeX have better support for 8-bit input (inputenc.sty),
   for example. The new version of AMSLaTeX, v1.2, is a great 
improvement
   over v1.1. (BTW, where are the AMSLaTeX docs? And the Babel docs?
   They're not under /usr/doc)

 - XDvi app-defaults are installed with wrong name (appended 
"-deb.tmp").
   This makes xdvi call MakeTeXPk in a wrong way (the mfmode string is
   defined in the app-defaults) that runs metafont for fontfiles that 
may
   already exist (if they were created by dvips, e.g., which makes the
   correct call to MakeTeXPk).

 - Install should ask what hyphenation patterns we want loaded by
   default. Should also ask what mfmode we want and what papersize.

 - Where is the beton package? (for use concrete and Euler math fonts.)

 - AucTeX command menu should be rightly configured. There is no command
   "LaTeX2e" in debian, for example. And what about the Command/print 
menu?
   Install should not ask about our TeX printers? I think that at least
   there should be some documentation telling us where to change this.

 - What is the path that xdvi/dvips uses for search pk files? It just
   looks for pk fonts under /var/spool/texmf/fonts? The fonts are
   not supposed to be moved to another place? If the are not, I suggest
   that fonts should be created under /var/lib/texmf/fonts. But maybe
   you decided this because of permision problems...

Besides the fact that I had to get ALL the LaTeX core, Babel, Graphics,
etc. from CTAN, I'm pretty happy with my TeX setup...

Waiting for you response. Regards, Emilio.

--
 Emilio C. Lopes                      FINPE, Instituto de Fisica
 E-mail: ecl@gluon.if.usp.br          Universidade de Sao Paulo

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: ecl%gluon@meson.if.usp.br (Emilio C. Lopes)
Subject: Bug#791: Acknowledgement (was: To the TeX mantainer.)
In-Reply-To: <199504111947.AA03981@pixar.com>
References: <199504111947.AA03981@pixar.com>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian 
GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message 
has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list 
for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#791" or "Re: Bug#791" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
psuedo-header at all.

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and
version(s) the problem is with next time.  Some time in the future the
problem reports system may start rejecting such messages.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk , with the debian-bugs tracking
mechanism
This page last modified 06:43:02 GMT Wed 21 Jun