Debian bug report logs - #945, boring messages

Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:

Subject: Bug#945: clock (-u) question
Reply-To: jwl@atlanta.cray.com (James W. Lynch), debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-From: jwl@atlanta.cray.com (James W. Lynch)
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 1995 16:03:05 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.945.060515493426823@pixar.com>
X-Debian-PR-Package: 
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Mon, 05 Jun 1995 16:03:05 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 060515493426823;
          Mon, 05 Jun 1995 15:49:36 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sIeMn-0007iLC; Mon, 5 Jun 95 08:47 PDT
Received: from timbuk.cray.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA00819
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-user-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Mon, 5 Jun 1995 08:45:35 -0700
Received: from dogwood.cray.com (dogwood.cray.com [128.162.46.3]) by timbuk.cray.com (8.6.11/CRI-gw-8-1.4) with SMTP id KAA11555; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 10:46:53 -0500
Received: by dogwood.cray.com (5.0/CRI-5.13)
	id AA00402; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 11:46:41 +0500
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 1995 11:46:41 +0500
From: jwl@atlanta.cray.com (James W. Lynch)
Message-Id: <9506051546.AA00402@dogwood.cray.com>
To: jimr@simons-rock.edu, jwl@atlanta.cray.com (James W. Lynch)
Cc: Debian Bugs <debian-bugs@pixar.com>, Debian User <debian-user@pixar.com>
X-Mailer: [XMailTool v3.1.0]
Content-Length: 1966

---------  Received message begins Here  ---------

> From debian-user-request@Pixar.com Mon Jun  5 11:34:25 1995
> Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Jun 1995 10:34:24 -0500
> Old-Return-Path: <jimr@simons-rock.edu>
> To: jwl (James W. Lynch)
> Cc: Debian User <debian-user@Pixar.com>, Debian Bugs <debian-bugs@Pixar.com>
> Subject: Re: clock (-u) question
> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 1995 11:32:00 -0400
> From: "James A. Robinson" <jimr@simons-rock.edu>
> Resent-Message-Id: <"TsreEC.A.NUH.aOy0v"@mongo>
> Resent-From: debian-user@Pixar.com
> X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@Pixar.com> archive/latest/752
> X-Loop: debian-user@Pixar.com
> Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@Pixar.com
> X-Display-Position: 0
>
>
> Package: sysvinit
> Version: 2.56
>
> > How is clock supposed to work?  It seems like it might read the
> > CMOS clock and set the Unix time to some number.  If so it has to
> > know what local time is (offset from GMT) if you leave off the
> > -u maybe?  I tried to set TZ earlier in the boot script, but that
> > didn't affect it either.
>
>
> I'm also having a problem with clock. I *believe* it is because the
> init.d/boot file runs clock before it mounts the other file systems,
> and I happen to have /usr on a "local" file system.
>
> --- snip ---
> 	# Set GMT="-u" if your system clock is set to GMT, and GMT=""
> 	# if not.
> 	GMT=""
> 	# Set and adjust the CMOS clock.
> 	clock -s $GMT
> 	if [ ! -f /etc/adjtime ]
> 	then
> 	  echo "0.0 0 0.0" > /etc/adjtime
> 	fi
> 	clock -a $GMT
>
> 	# Mount local file systems in /etc/fstab.
> 	echo "Mounting local file systems..."
> 	mount -avt nonfs
> --- snip ---
>
>
> Jim
>
>
Jim,

Moving the clock line to after the mount fixed my problem.

Thanks,
Jim.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Lynch, Sales Analyst,  Cray Research, Inc. / ARS: K4GVO
Southeast District, Phone: (404) 631-2254, Email: jwl@cray.com
Suite 270, 200 Westpark Drive, Peachtree City, GA 30269

Message sent:

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: jwl@atlanta.cray.com (James W. Lynch)
Subject: Bug#945: Acknowledgement (was: clock (-u) question)
In-Reply-To: <9506051546.AA00402@dogwood.cray.com>
References: <9506051546.AA00402@dogwood.cray.com>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#945" or "Re: Bug#945" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
psuedo-header at all.

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and
version(s) the problem is with next time.  Some time in the future the
problem reports system may start rejecting such messages.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)