Debian bug report logs - #762
Comments about and bugs in 0.93R5 base system
Package: base; Reported by: rjk1002@hermes.cam.ac.uk (Richard Kettlewell), iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson); 73 days old.
Message received at debian-bugs:
From cus.cam.ac.uk!iwj10 Sat Apr 8 09:42:20 1995
Return-Path: <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rxdaU-0005o7C; Sat, 8 Apr 95 09:42 PDT
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA24734
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <debian-bugs@pixar.com>); Sat, 8 Apr 1995 09:42:08 -0700
Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk
(Smail-3.1.29.0 #30) id m0rxdaI-000BzfC; Sat, 8 Apr 95 17:42 BST
Received: by chiark
id m0rxbP3-0000YjZ
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.30); Sat, 8 Apr 95 15:22 BST
Message-Id: <m0rxbP3-0000YjZ.ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 95 15:22 BST
From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Debian bugs submission address <debian-bugs@pixar.com>
Cc: rjk1002@hermes.cam.ac.uk (Richard Kettlewell)
Reply-To: rjk1002@hermes.cam.ac.uk (Richard Kettlewell),
iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
Subject: Comments about and bugs in 0.93R5 base system
Package: base
Version: 0.93R5
** Host/domain name
Perhaps there should be some advice about what to do about domain
names for machines not connected to the net. I follow something
similar to the Dave Holland convention...
** Boot disk
When making a bootdisk, IMO an option should be offered to do run
fdformat; currently one must have a formatted disk to hand.
** During installation
*** Mount/unmount
In the mount/unmount menu after booting with the bootdisk/rootdisk
pair, I see the message:
/sbin/dinstall: 361648: no such file or directory
Everything seems to work as expected otherwise, however.
[ I've reported this already, I believe. - iwj ]
** Booting Up
*** root password, user account
/root/.bash_profile~ did not appear to exist, which caused a rather
irritating loop when setting initial passwords, etc. I don't know if
it was my fault that it did not exist (though I strongly believe that
it wasn't).
As a consequence of this -- or at least of my botched fix to it --
/sbin was not in root's PATH when I came to configure installed
packages; and when dpkg tried to configure the libc package, it
couldn't find ldconfig and left the libc.so.4 link stale (ditto libm).
All binaries requiring it failed to run.
However, after I fixed things and added /sbin to root's path, libc
installed without any problems.
[ I've reported this already, I believe. - iwj ]
(This bug is reported to me by Richard Kettlewell,
rjk1002@hermes.cam.ac.uk. He doesn't have email connectivity at the
moment as it's out of term now and he's at home.)
Acknowledgement sent to rjk1002@hermes.cam.ac.uk (Richard Kettlewell), iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson):
New bug report received and forwarded.
Full text available.
Report forwarded to debian-devel@pixar.com:
Bug#762; Package base.
Full text available.
Ian Jackson /
iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk,
with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism