Debian bug report logs - #675, boring messages

Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:

Subject: Bug#675: xbaseR6 recommends all sorts of things
Reply-To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson), debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 21:48:28 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.675.0330214730915@pixar.com>
X-Debian-PR-Package: xbaseR6
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 21:48:28 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 0330214730915;
          Thu, 30 Mar 1995 21:47:30 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0ruS2K-0008dwA; Thu, 30 Mar 95 13:45 PST
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA17768
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <debian-bugs@pixar.com>); Thu, 30 Mar 1995 13:45:31 -0800
Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk
	(Smail-3.1.29.0 #30) id m0ruRqo-000BzlA; Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:33 BST
Received: by chiark (Smail3.1.28.1 #3)
	id m0ruRoR-0002gOA; Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:31 BST
Message-Id: <m0ruRoR-0002gOA.ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:31 BST
From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Debian bugs submission address <debian-bugs@pixar.com>
Precedence: air-mail

Package: xbaseR6
Version: 3.1.1-1

The xbaseR6 control file contains the following information:

 Recommended: xfntbas, xbaseR5 | xr5shlib, x8514 | xagx | xmach8 |
               xmach32 | xmach64 | xmono | xp9000 | xs3 | xsvga | xvga16 |
               xw32, xfnt75, xcompR6,
              emacs | xaxe | xcoral,
              ghostviewR6, gxditviewR6, xxgdbR6, fvwmR6, gcc
 Optional: xfig, xfnt100, xfntscl, xfntbig, gnuplot, seyon, xdevelR6

The X servers I can understand.  However, much of the rest is
questionable.

Surely the fonts should be Depended on by the X server(s) rather than
the clients ?

It is not necessary to practically force the user to select an
X-native editor if they don't want to (and in any case, if you want to
mention Emacs you should mention emacs-x).

It is *definitely* not necessary to mention explicitly in the Optional
field half a dozen applications that they might want to install.  If
they want to install these applications the user will do so
themselves; you should not get dselect to preempt this by filling the
Optional field full of stuff like that.

Finally, what is GCC doing in there ?!

Ian.

Message sent:

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
Subject: Bug#675: Acknowledgement (was: xbaseR6 recommends all sorts of things)
In-Reply-To: <m0ruRoR-0002gOA.ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu>
References: <m0ruRoR-0002gOA.ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#675" or "Re: Bug#675" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)