Debian bug report logs - #1013, boring messages


Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:


Subject: Bug#1013: This isn't fixed yet?
Reply-To: rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller), debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-From: rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller)
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1995 01:48:07 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1013.06170134585390@pixar.com>
X-Debian-PR-Package: wu-ftpd
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 01:48:07 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 06170134585390;
          Sat, 17 Jun 1995 01:34:59 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sMmlh-0005lbC; Fri, 16 Jun 95 18:33 PDT
Received: from hydra.legislate.com ([192.77.155.4]) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA27480
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Fri, 16 Jun 1995 18:32:19 -0700
Received: by hydra.legislate.com
	id <m0sMj30-0004ioC@legislate.com>
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.32); Fri, 16 Jun 95 21:35 GMT
Message-Id: <m0sMj30-0004ioC@hydra.legislate.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 95 21:35 GMT
From: rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller)
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com

Package: wu-ftpd

From: alex <alex@bach.cis.temple.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.announce
Followup-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: 16 Jun 1995 15:59:33 +0300
Organization: ?
Lines: 202
Keywords: FAQ, update

- - - - - - - LSF Update#4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

		Washington University FTP Server Version 2.4
			  LINUX SECURITY FAQ UPDATE
			   June 3, 1995  11:37 EST

		    Last Update: June 7, 1995  20:38 EST

		   Copyright (C) 1995 Alexander O. Yuriev
		     CIS Laboratories, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
			 <alex@bach.cis.temple.edu>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 This is an update to Linux Security FAQ. The FAQ itself is not completely
 written yet and currently covers only Slackware Linux distribution. If you
   use a different Linux distribution and the location name of some files
    differ from the ones used in this update, please drop me a note at at
			 <alex@bach.cis.temple.edu>.

      If you create your own Linux distributions that are being placed on
		   FTP sites or CDs, please contact me!

    Linux FAQ WWW is http://bach.cis.temple.edu/linux/linux-security
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


On June 2, 1995, the Australian Computer Emergency Response Team published
an advisory about the security hole in some binaries of the wu.ftpd 2.4
(Washington University FTP Server) in major Linux distributions. This Linux
Security FAQ Update is an attempt to provide more detailed information about
the vulnerability of the Washington University FTP Server and methods of
fixing it.



ABSTRACT:
=========


	The default configuration of the Washington University FTP Server
	version 2.4 in major Linux distributions including Slackware 2.0,
	2.1, 2.2, 2.3, Yggdrasil Plug&Play Fall'94 and Debian Distribution
	has a configuration problem which allows any user with an account on
	a system to gain the root access.



DETECTION:
==========


	The following set of commands can be used to determine if your ftp
	server is affected (source host's name is viper. The name of a
	system being checked is devnull)

	[jru@viper]:~> ftp devnull
	Connected to devnull
	220 ftphost FTP server (Version wu-2.4(3) Wed May 31 04:11:15 EDT 1995)
	Name (devnull:jru): jru
	331 Password required for jru
	Password:
	230 User user logged in.
	ftp> quote site exec echo Joe Random User
	200-echo Joe Random User
	200-Joe Random User
	200  (end of 'echo Joe Random User')
	ftp> quit
	221 Goodbye.

	If you see the phrase you specified in echo command is displayed on
	the screen, then the configuration of the ftp server on the host is
	probably vulnerable and you will need to obtain a fix for it.


QUICK FIX:
==========


	Unfortunately, the fix is more than a one step process. We advise you
	to start by shutting down the ftp server using the command:

		ftpshut now

	This command blocks all connections to the ftp server.


ANONYMOUS FTP:
==============


	Unfortunately, it is not possible to be 100% sure if the anonymous
	ftp is affected. In theory, if all of the following conditions
	are true an anonymous ftp user can exploit the hole:

		1) Uploads are allowed
		2) Anonymous users are allowed to use chmod.
		3) GNU tar is present in the SITE EXECable directory

	In practice, we could not reconstruct an attack that can be used by
	the anonymous user to exploit the hole. [Olaf Kirch managed to open
	a non-root xterm(1) window from as an anonymous user] Nevertheless,
	please close it just to be safe. We would also like to mention that
	there should be absolutely no reason to allow an anonymous user to
	change access permissions of files from your ftp server. To block
	it, edit the ftpaccess file which is usually located in the /etc
	directory (/etc/ftpaccess) and the add line.

		chmod	no	guest, anonymous


OBTAINING A FIX:
================


	Debian/GNU Linux:

		Users of Debian Linux Distribution can obtain fixed binary
		from the primary Debian distribution site.

	wu-ftpd 2.4 source code:

		The correctly configured wu-ftpd 2.4 server for Linux can be
		obtained at the following URLs:

		ftp://linux.nrao.edu/pub/people/alex/wu-ftpd-2.4-fix/

		ftp://linux.nrao.edu/pub/people/alex/wu-ftpd-2.4-fix/

		ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/ (I don't know where it will
						  end up)

		In addition to the source code of patched wu-ftpd 2.4 you
		can get the patch that would create a "fixed" tree from the
		original wu-ftpd 2. and the wu-ftpd 2.4 itself. All files
		have their MD5 checksums in the file CHECKSUMS in the same
		directory.



LIST OF AFFECTED DISTRIBUTIONS:
==============================

	As of today, we are aware that the following distributions are
	affected and have to be patched:


		Slackware Linux 2.0
		Slackware Linux 2.1
		Slackware Linux 2.2
		Slackware Linux 2.3
		Debian/GNU Linux
		Yggdrasil Plug&Play'94
		Boggus 1.01


	Authors of Red Hat Linux distributions claim that their
	distributions are not affected. Unfortunately, we were unable to
	verify this claim as apparently neither Olaf Kirch nor Jeff Uphoff
	nor I have access to it, although we do hope that it is true. The
	Red Hat Linux Distributions are known to have the latest fixes
	included.


	We would like users of other Linux distributions to inform us if
	their version of wu-ftpd was affected. If you are a user or a
	maintainer of one of the following distributions, please contact us.

		Mini Linux Distribution
		TAMU
		SLS
		MCC


"OUR THANK YOU"
===============

	I would like to thank the following people for their help in researching
	this problem and providing a solution:

		Olaf Kirch (okir@monad.swb.de), Wolfgang Ley
		(ley@cert.dfn.de), Jeff Uphoff (juphoff@linux.nrao.edu)
		and last, but not least, Scott Weinstein (SWEIN@ALBNYVMS.BITNET)
		who within a day from the original time I posted the update
		informed us about a problem with Bogus Linux distribution

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


============================================================================
Alexander O. Yuriev		            Email: alex@bach.cis.temple.edu
CIS Labs, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   WWW: http://bach.cis.temple.edu/personal/alex
Philadelphia, PA, USA

   PGP Key: 1024/ADF3EE95  Fingerprint: AB4FE7382C3627BC 6934EC2A2C05AB62

Unless otherwise stated, everything above is my personal opinion and not an
	       opinion of any organisation affiliated with me.
=============================================================================

--
Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: linux-announce@news.ornl.gov
PLEASE remember Keywords: and a short description of the software.



Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller)
Subject: Bug#1013: Acknowledgement (was: This isn't fixed yet?)
In-Reply-To: <m0sMj30-0004ioC@hydra.legislate.com>
References: <m0sMj30-0004ioC@hydra.legislate.com>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#1013" or "Re: Bug#1013" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)


Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:


Subject: Bug#1013: This isn't fixed yet?
Reply-To: "James A. Robinson" <jimr@simons-rock.edu>, debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-From: "James A. Robinson" <jimr@simons-rock.edu>
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1995 02:33:09 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1013.06170220475934@pixar.com>
X-Debian-PR-Package: wu-ftpd
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 02:33:09 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 06170220475934;
          Sat, 17 Jun 1995 02:20:47 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sMnU4-0005z9C; Fri, 16 Jun 95 19:19 PDT
Received: from plato.simons-rock.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA29989
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Fri, 16 Jun 1995 19:16:58 -0700
Received: from simons-rock.edu by plato.simons-rock.edu with smtp
	(Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0sMnSb-000017C; Fri, 16 Jun 95 22:18 EDT
Message-Id: <m0sMnSb-000017C@plato.simons-rock.edu>
To: rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller), debian-bugs@pixar.com
In-Reply-To: Message from rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller)
   of "Fri, 16 Jun 1995 21:35:00 GMT." <m0sMj30-0004ioC@hydra.legislate.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 22:18:09 -0400
From: "James A. Robinson" <jimr@simons-rock.edu>


I believe Peter released a fixed version in v 2.4-9.


Jim


Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: "James A. Robinson" <jimr@simons-rock.edu>
Subject: Bug#1013: Info received (was Bug#1013: This isn't fixed yet?)
In-Reply-To: <m0sMnSb-000017C@plato.simons-rock.edu>
References: <m0sMnSb-000017C@plato.simons-rock.edu>

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developers to
accompany the original report.

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring
that the Subject line starts with "Bug#1013" or "Re: Bug#1013" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)


Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: tobias@et-inf.fho-emden.de
In-Reply-To: <9506170815.AA11598@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de>
References: <9506170815.AA11598@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de> <m0sMj30-0004ioC@hydra.legislate.com>
Subject: Bug#1013: marked as done (was: This isn't fixed yet?)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 1995 10:15:40 +0000 (GMT-1:00)
with message-id <9506170815.AA11598@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de>
and subject line Bug#1013: This isn't fixed yet?
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt
with.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 06170134585390;
          Sat, 17 Jun 1995 01:34:59 GMT
From legislate.com!rdr Fri Jun 16 18:33:50 1995
Return-Path: <rdr@legislate.com>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sMmlh-0005lbC; Fri, 16 Jun 95 18:33 PDT
Received: from hydra.legislate.com ([192.77.155.4]) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA27480
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Fri, 16 Jun 1995 18:32:19 -0700
Received: by hydra.legislate.com
	id <m0sMj30-0004ioC@legislate.com>
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.32); Fri, 16 Jun 95 21:35 GMT
Message-Id: <m0sMj30-0004ioC@hydra.legislate.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 95 21:35 GMT
From: rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller)
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Subject: This isn't fixed yet?

Package: wu-ftpd

From: alex <alex@bach.cis.temple.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.announce
Followup-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: 16 Jun 1995 15:59:33 +0300
Organization: ?
Lines: 202
Keywords: FAQ, update

- - - - - - - LSF Update#4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

		Washington University FTP Server Version 2.4
			  LINUX SECURITY FAQ UPDATE
			   June 3, 1995  11:37 EST

		    Last Update: June 7, 1995  20:38 EST

		   Copyright (C) 1995 Alexander O. Yuriev
		     CIS Laboratories, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
			 <alex@bach.cis.temple.edu>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 This is an update to Linux Security FAQ. The FAQ itself is not completely
 written yet and currently covers only Slackware Linux distribution. If you
   use a different Linux distribution and the location name of some files
    differ from the ones used in this update, please drop me a note at at
			 <alex@bach.cis.temple.edu>.

      If you create your own Linux distributions that are being placed on
		   FTP sites or CDs, please contact me!

    Linux FAQ WWW is http://bach.cis.temple.edu/linux/linux-security
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


On June 2, 1995, the Australian Computer Emergency Response Team published
an advisory about the security hole in some binaries of the wu.ftpd 2.4
(Washington University FTP Server) in major Linux distributions. This Linux
Security FAQ Update is an attempt to provide more detailed information about
the vulnerability of the Washington University FTP Server and methods of
fixing it.



ABSTRACT:
=========


	The default configuration of the Washington University FTP Server
	version 2.4 in major Linux distributions including Slackware 2.0,
	2.1, 2.2, 2.3, Yggdrasil Plug&Play Fall'94 and Debian Distribution
	has a configuration problem which allows any user with an account on
	a system to gain the root access.



DETECTION:
==========


	The following set of commands can be used to determine if your ftp
	server is affected (source host's name is viper. The name of a
	system being checked is devnull)

	[jru@viper]:~> ftp devnull
	Connected to devnull
	220 ftphost FTP server (Version wu-2.4(3) Wed May 31 04:11:15 EDT 1995)
	Name (devnull:jru): jru
	331 Password required for jru
	Password:
	230 User user logged in.
	ftp> quote site exec echo Joe Random User
	200-echo Joe Random User
	200-Joe Random User
	200  (end of 'echo Joe Random User')
	ftp> quit
	221 Goodbye.

	If you see the phrase you specified in echo command is displayed on
	the screen, then the configuration of the ftp server on the host is
	probably vulnerable and you will need to obtain a fix for it.


QUICK FIX:
==========


	Unfortunately, the fix is more than a one step process. We advise you
	to start by shutting down the ftp server using the command:

		ftpshut now

	This command blocks all connections to the ftp server.


ANONYMOUS FTP:
==============


	Unfortunately, it is not possible to be 100% sure if the anonymous
	ftp is affected. In theory, if all of the following conditions
	are true an anonymous ftp user can exploit the hole:

		1) Uploads are allowed
		2) Anonymous users are allowed to use chmod.
		3) GNU tar is present in the SITE EXECable directory

	In practice, we could not reconstruct an attack that can be used by
	the anonymous user to exploit the hole. [Olaf Kirch managed to open
	a non-root xterm(1) window from as an anonymous user] Nevertheless,
	please close it just to be safe. We would also like to mention that
	there should be absolutely no reason to allow an anonymous user to
	change access permissions of files from your ftp server. To block
	it, edit the ftpaccess file which is usually located in the /etc
	directory (/etc/ftpaccess) and the add line.

		chmod	no	guest, anonymous


OBTAINING A FIX:
================


	Debian/GNU Linux:

		Users of Debian Linux Distribution can obtain fixed binary
		from the primary Debian distribution site.

	wu-ftpd 2.4 source code:

		The correctly configured wu-ftpd 2.4 server for Linux can be
		obtained at the following URLs:

		ftp://linux.nrao.edu/pub/people/alex/wu-ftpd-2.4-fix/

		ftp://linux.nrao.edu/pub/people/alex/wu-ftpd-2.4-fix/

		ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/ (I don't know where it will
						  end up)

		In addition to the source code of patched wu-ftpd 2.4 you
		can get the patch that would create a "fixed" tree from the
		original wu-ftpd 2. and the wu-ftpd 2.4 itself. All files
		have their MD5 checksums in the file CHECKSUMS in the same
		directory.



LIST OF AFFECTED DISTRIBUTIONS:
==============================

	As of today, we are aware that the following distributions are
	affected and have to be patched:


		Slackware Linux 2.0
		Slackware Linux 2.1
		Slackware Linux 2.2
		Slackware Linux 2.3
		Debian/GNU Linux
		Yggdrasil Plug&Play'94
		Boggus 1.01


	Authors of Red Hat Linux distributions claim that their
	distributions are not affected. Unfortunately, we were unable to
	verify this claim as apparently neither Olaf Kirch nor Jeff Uphoff
	nor I have access to it, although we do hope that it is true. The
	Red Hat Linux Distributions are known to have the latest fixes
	included.


	We would like users of other Linux distributions to inform us if
	their version of wu-ftpd was affected. If you are a user or a
	maintainer of one of the following distributions, please contact us.

		Mini Linux Distribution
		TAMU
		SLS
		MCC


"OUR THANK YOU"
===============

	I would like to thank the following people for their help in researching
	this problem and providing a solution:

		Olaf Kirch (okir@monad.swb.de), Wolfgang Ley
		(ley@cert.dfn.de), Jeff Uphoff (juphoff@linux.nrao.edu)
		and last, but not least, Scott Weinstein (SWEIN@ALBNYVMS.BITNET)
		who within a day from the original time I posted the update
		informed us about a problem with Bogus Linux distribution

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


============================================================================
Alexander O. Yuriev		            Email: alex@bach.cis.temple.edu
CIS Labs, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   WWW: http://bach.cis.temple.edu/personal/alex
Philadelphia, PA, USA

   PGP Key: 1024/ADF3EE95  Fingerprint: AB4FE7382C3627BC 6934EC2A2C05AB62

Unless otherwise stated, everything above is my personal opinion and not an
	       opinion of any organisation affiliated with me.
=============================================================================

--
Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: linux-announce@news.ornl.gov
PLEASE remember Keywords: and a short description of the software.



Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller)
Subject: Bug#1013 acknowledged by developer (was: This isn't fixed yet?)
References: <9506170815.AA11598@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de> <m0sMj30-0004ioC@hydra.legislate.com>
In-Reply-To: <m0sMj30-0004ioC@hydra.legislate.com>

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report.

Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely
tobias@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (Peter Tobias) (reply to tobias@et-inf.fho-emden.de).

You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if
you have not already done so.  If not, please contact them directly,
or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)


Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:


Subject: Bug#1013: This isn't fixed yet?
Reply-To: tobias@et-inf.fho-emden.de, debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-From: tobias@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (Peter Tobias)
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1995 08:33:04 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1013.061708210611980@pixar.com>
X-Debian-PR-Package: wu-ftpd
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 08:33:04 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 061708210611980;
          Sat, 17 Jun 1995 08:21:07 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sMt6I-0005z9C; Sat, 17 Jun 95 01:19 PDT
Received: from server.et-inf.fho-emden.de by pixar.com with SMTP id AA16490
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Sat, 17 Jun 1995 01:18:01 -0700
Received: by server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
	id AA11598; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 10:15:41 +0200
From: tobias@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (Peter Tobias)
Message-Id: <9506170815.AA11598@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de>
To: rdr@legislate.com, debian-bugs@pixar.com
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1995 10:15:40 +0000 (GMT-1:00)
Cc: debian-bugs-done@pixar.com
In-Reply-To: <m0sMj30-0004ioC@hydra.legislate.com> from "Raul Miller" at Jun 16, 95 09:35:00 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL17]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 935

Raul Miller wrote:
> Package: wu-ftpd
[...]
> On June 2, 1995, the Australian Computer Emergency Response Team published
> an advisory about the security hole in some binaries of the wu.ftpd 2.4
> (Washington University FTP Server) in major Linux distributions. This Linux
> Security FAQ Update is an attempt to provide more detailed information about
> the vulnerability of the Washington University FTP Server and methods of
> fixing it.
[...]
> OBTAINING A FIX:
> ================
>
>
> 	Debian/GNU Linux:
>
> 		Users of Debian Linux Distribution can obtain fixed binary
> 		from the primary Debian distribution site.

The fixed version (2.4-9) is available since May 31, 1995.


Peter

--
 Peter Tobias                                EMail:
 Fachhochschule Ostfriesland                 tobias@et-inf.fho-emden.de
 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informatik   tobias@perseus.fho-emden.de
 Constantiaplatz 4, 26723 Emden, Germany


Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: tobias@et-inf.fho-emden.de
Subject: Bug#1013: Info received (was Bug#1013: This isn't fixed yet?)
In-Reply-To: <9506170815.AA11598@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de>
References: <9506170815.AA11598@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de>

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developers to
accompany the original report.

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring
that the Subject line starts with "Bug#1013" or "Re: Bug#1013" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)


Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:


Subject: Bug#1013: This isn't fixed yet?
Reply-To: rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller), debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-From: rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller)
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1995 12:03:01 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1013.061711521920256@pixar.com>
X-Debian-PR-Package: wu-ftpd
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 12:03:01 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 061711521920256;
          Sat, 17 Jun 1995 11:52:19 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sMwP4-0005z9C; Sat, 17 Jun 95 04:51 PDT
Received: from hydra.legislate.com ([192.77.155.4]) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA22398
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-done-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Sat, 17 Jun 1995 04:49:37 -0700
Received: by hydra.legislate.com
	id <m0sMsgD-0004hfC@legislate.com>
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.32); Sat, 17 Jun 95 07:52 GMT
Message-Id: <m0sMsgD-0004hfC@hydra.legislate.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 95 07:52 GMT
From: rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller)
To: tobias@et-inf.fho-emden.de
Cc: debian-bugs@pixar.com, debian-bugs-done@pixar.com
In-Reply-To: <9506170815.AA11598@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de> (tobias@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de)

On closer investigation, even though I thought I'd installed version
9, I hadn't.  [re-?] installation fixed the problem.

Sorry about the noise,

Raul


Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: rdr@legislate.com (Raul Miller)
Subject: Bug#1013: Info received (was Bug#1013: This isn't fixed yet?)
In-Reply-To: <m0sMsgD-0004hfC@hydra.legislate.com>
References: <m0sMsgD-0004hfC@hydra.legislate.com>

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developers to
accompany the original report.

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring
that the Subject line starts with "Bug#1013" or "Re: Bug#1013" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)


Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk, with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism
This page last modified 06:43:02 GMT Wed 21 Jun